🔗 Share this article

In a unsigned order, the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed Texas to use a newly configured congressional district plan that is projected to include as many as five additional conservative-tilting districts. The 6-3 ruling, issued on Thursday, grants a petition by the state to set aside a lower court's injunction that had struck down the boundaries in November.

Court's Rationale

The district court improperly inserted itself into an ongoing primary campaign, generating considerable confusion and upsetting the fine balance of power in elections, the justices wrote in detailing its ruling.

The district court had earlier ruled that Texas had likely grouped voters according to their race – a act known as unconstitutional racial sorting – when it enacted the redistricting plan. It had mandated the state to employ the maps established after the last decennial survey for the next year's election.

Sharp Dissenting Opinion

Through a sharply worded dissenting opinion, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's action. She stated that it undermined the work of the district court, observing that its ruling was written by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

We are a higher court than the district court, but we are not a better one when it comes to making such a fact-based decision, Kagan argued in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, The majority's order solidifies that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its enhanced political tilt, will dictate next year's elections. And it means that many Texas residents, unjustly, will be sorted in electoral districts based on their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced year in and year out, is a violation of the law of the land.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Battle

The court's action occurs during a national battle over the redistricting of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in pushes to reshape the U.S. House map to bolster a narrow Republican hold. Ordinarily, boundary revision happens after a new decade's census. Yet the action by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold off-cycle redistricting earlier in the summer sparked a series of events among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved redistricting plans that might create several more GOP-friendly seats. The opposition, for their part, have pushed back with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which might neutralize those potential gains.

Political Reactions

Lone Star State AG welcomed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order upheld Texas's prerogative to draw a map that guarantees electoral outcomes supportive of his party. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he remarked.

In contrast, Democratic officials decried the ruling. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the head of a major party election organization.

A leading House leader stated the court had another time eroded its credibility by rubber-stamping a racially gerrymandered map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he stated.