🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on NZ local authorities is set to be cut by more than half, following a divisive legislative amendment that required local governments to submit the fate of hard-won Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Māori Wards

Indigenous electoral districts, which may have multiple councillors based on local population numbers, were established in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the option to elect a assured Māori representative in local and regional authorities. Initially, local governments could only create a Māori ward by first putting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities often spent years building local support and urging their local governments to create Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the former administration allowed municipal authorities to establish a Indigenous seat without initially mandating them to subject it to a popular ballot.

But in 2024, the current administration reversed the change, stating local residents ought to determine whether to establish Māori wards.

Referendum Results

The coalition’s law change required local authorities that had created a ward under the previous policy to hold binding referendums concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on 11 October. Of 42 councils taking part in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their wards, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – showing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

The results represented “a crucial move in restoring community self-determination.”

Opposition parties nevertheless have condemned the new policy as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the coalition government has implemented sweeping rollbacks to measures designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. The government has said it aims to terminate “race-based” policies, and says it is committed to enhancing results for Indigenous people and every citizen.

Urban-Rural Divide

Outcomes of the referendums were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven cities required to vote supported Indigenous seats, while rural regions leaned strongly towards removing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Electoral Participation and Concerns

This year’s municipal polls recorded the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with under one-third of citizens participating, prompting calls for an overhaul.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Local governments are permitted to create different electoral districts – such as countryside seats – without first requiring a public vote. The disparate requirements applied to Māori wards suggested the government was targeting Indigenous inclusion.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Numerous localities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that chose to retain their seats.